BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC. v. ELLERTH () F.3d , affirmed. Syllabus, Opinion [ Kennedy ], Concurrence [ Ginsburg ], Dissent [ Thomas ]. Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 26 , , ruled (7–2) that—under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of , which. Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth. Determined whether an employee who suffered sexual harassment by a supervisor can recover damages against her.
|Published (Last):||14 June 2014|
|PDF File Size:||5.49 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||11.61 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Kimberly Ellerth plaintiff was a salesperson for Burlington Industries, Inc. Burlington defendant from March to May Ellerth applied for and received a promotion, but Slowik continued to make sexist, offensive comments.
The court of appeals reversed, and Burlington petitioned for review by the United States Supreme Court. Unlock this case brief with a free no-commitment burlingtonn membership of Quimbee. Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97, law students since Induustries law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.
Read our student testimonials. Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: Read more about Quimbee.
Are you a current student of? The operation could not be completed. If you logged out from your Quimbee account, please login and try again. If not, you may need to refresh the page. Thank you for ellertg support! United States Supreme Court U. The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision. To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.
The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question. The holding and reasoning section includes: A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section; A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and The procedural disposition e.
What to do next… Unlock this case brief with a free no-commitment trial membership of Quimbee.
Here’s whylaw indushries have relied on our case briefs: Written by law professors and practitionersnot other law students.
The right amount of informationincludes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents. Access in your classesworks on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions. Easy to useuniform format for every case brief.
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth
Written in plain English, not in legalese. Reliable – written by law professors and practitioners not other law students. The right length and amount of information – includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents. Access in your class – works on your mobile and tablet.
Uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English – not in legalese and not just repeating the court’s language. Massive library of related video lessons – and practice questions. Ability to tag case briefs in an outlining tool.
Casebooks Employment Zimmer, 9th Ed. Start your FREE trial.
Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth | Legal Momentum
Sign up with Google. You can try any plan risk-free for 7 days. No contracts or commitments.
Sign in with Google. You can try any plan risk-free for 30 days. Try Quimbee for Free or Cancel.